[El Gato]

Looks to me like the typist ususally used the lower case "l" instead of a "1". But for some reason didn't in the that "10th April" date.

To me the fact the characters don't follow the folds, but rather appear to float over them is a much bigger indictement. (In fact they, both typed and printed characaters, seem to float over the entire backgroun, it's especially obvious if one reverses the colors in the image.

Notice that Bomford does not say something like, "It even has the same numbers for the place, book and page, the information was recorded." As that is the central item that indicates that one of the documents is a forgery.

[snowsislander]

To me the fact the characters don't follow the folds, but rather appear to float over them is a much bigger indictement. (In fact they, both typed and printed characaters, seem to float over the entire backgroun, it's especially obvious if one reverses the colors in the image.

Yes, it's interesting how the characters seem to float, and certainly the characters should follow the folds.

However, all of the obvious metadata bits in the Bomford file point toward a scanner at low resolution:

File Modification Date/Time     : 2007:06:05 07:15:37-04:00
File Type                       : JPEG
MIME Type                       : image/jpeg
JFIF Version                    : 1.00
Resolution Unit                 : inches
X Resolution                    : 150
Y Resolution                    : 150
Comment                         : LEAD Technologies Inc. V1.01
Image Width                     : 1215
Image Height                    : 1747
Encoding Process                : Baseline DCT, Huffman coding
Bits Per Sample                 : 8
Color Components                : 3
Y Cb Cr Sub Sampling            : YCbCr4:4:4 (1 1)
Image Size                      : 1215x1747

What I find out odd here is that this seems to point to an A4 size document, but I don't think that Australia's government was using A4 paper back in 1964.