To: All
I'm not an expert, I'm not a lawyer this is my honest opinion in reference to the two BC's
It's easy to find out if the person that uploaded the second BC
is the same one that owns the domain .
http://www.bomford.net/worcestershire/images/DavidJeffreyBomfordBirthCertDoc65.jpg
http://www.internic.ca/whois.asp?domain=bomford.net&wserver=whois.internic.ca
MELBOURNE IT, LTD. D/B/A INTERNET NAMES WORLDWIDE
Domain Name: bomford.net
The results below are provided by MELBOURNE IT, LTD. D/B/A INTERNET NAMES WORLDWIDE (whois.melbourneit.com)
Domain Name.......... bomford.net
Creation Date........ 2005-02-08
Registration Date.... 2005-02-08
Expiry Date.......... 2010-02-08
Organisation Name.... Richard Bomford
Organisation Address. 25 Berrigan Crescent
Organisation Address.
Organisation Address. OConnor
Organisation Address. 2602
Organisation Address. ACT
Organisation Address. AUSTRALIA
Admin Name........... Richard Bomford
Admin Address........ 25 Berrigan Crescent
Admin Address........
Admin Address........ OConnor
Admin Address........ 2602
Admin Address........ ACT
Admin Address........ AUSTRALIA
Admin Email.......... web1manager@bomford.net
Admin Phone.......... +61.262477959
Admin Fax............
Tech Name............ YahooDomains TechContact
Tech Address......... 701 First Ave.
Tech Address.........
Tech Address......... Sunnyvale
Tech Address......... 94089
Tech Address......... CA
Tech Address......... UNITED STATES
Tech Email........... domain.tech@yahoo-inc.com
Tech Phone........... +1.6198813096
Tech Fax.............
Name Server.......... ns1.serverlinks.net
Name Server.......... ns2.serverlinks.net
----------------------------------
The url shows is doc65 it was uploaded on 8/3/09
This is large genealogy page that picture of the second BC was uploaded timely, just
after Orly filed a case in Court.
Three images are posted under that domain and only on 8/3/09 and 8/4/09
http://www.bomford.net/worcestershire/images/DavidJeffreyBomfordBirthCertDoc65.jpg
http://www.bomford.net/worcestershire/images/GeorgeHubertBomfordBirthCertDoc68.jpg
http://www.bomford.net/worcestershire/images/AlaricBomfordBirthCertDoc66.jpg
IMAGE 64 AND 67 DOES NOT EXIST.
Not Found
The requested URL /worcestershire/images/AlaricBomfordBirthCertDoc67.jpg was not found on this server.
Not Found
The requested URL /worcestershire/images/AlaricBomfordBirthCertDoc64.jpg was not found on this server.
http://www.bomford.net/worcestershire/index.htm
David Bomford in Adelaide, South Australia, is putting together a collection of pictures of Bomfords, old and new.
If you have any which you would be able to share, please send him an email at david.bomford@bomford.net.
------------------------------------------------------
FIRST BC IN COURT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Notice of Electronic FilingThe following transaction was entered by Taitz, Orly on 8/1/2009 at 10:08 PM PDT and filed on 8/1/2009
Case Name: |
Ambassador Alan Keyes PhD, et al v. Barack Hussein Obama, et al |
Case Number: |
8:09-cv-82 |
Filer: |
Alan Keyes PhD
CLICK TO ENLARGE
|
SECOND BC ON INTERNET
http://investigatingobama.blogspot.com/
Edit, 8/4, 12:39: Sam Sewell has published an image file of the Bomford BC, during the program.
Who ever found and posted just on time on 8/3/09 at the genealogy site should
take original to Court in California since the case is already in there.
Even is a large genelealogy site I only found the three images above posted
on 8/3/09 and 8/04/09
At the same time, if proved the first BC is fake and the second is not, there should
be a criminal investigation to see if the first BC was done with the
intention to discredit Taitz and followers due to the timely discover of the second BC.
Also investigators should check W. L. Hawes, Government Printer to verify
if same format used in Kenya at that time was used in Australia.
Must find about District of Hindmarsh the second BC has number 2 and 5733,
which number was the birth in 1959.
I could be wrong but something should be done legally against these masters of deceit ,
this is very important for our own FREEDOM AND
CONSTITUTION THAT ARE AT RISK.
Miriam Mata
http://usurpador.blogcindario.com/
6,138 posted on
08/04/2009 8:23:31 AM PDT by
Corazon
(Obama the usurper)
To: Corazon
I said that yesterday that the Bombard image was uploaded on 08/03/2009 and someone said “No, that’s the date that your system downloaded the webpage”
Which is it?
6,148 posted on
08/04/2009 8:38:55 AM PDT by
autumnraine
(You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
To: Corazon
Hmm... it should be noted that 1 of the images that is used there should not be there.. it was promptly taken care and wiped out.
To: Corazon; Salamander
I see you used Salamander’s “enhanced” image...
Salamander? I don’t think you’re ever going to live this down.
Can we use you as a object lesson for how “mistakes” never truly go away on the interwebs?
};^P>
6,251 posted on
08/04/2009 12:16:56 PM PDT by
null and void
(We are now in day 195 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson