_____________ Unless, it was attached to a copy of the divorce decree and was in Sr’s possession. The divorce was in Hawaii, there were 5 attachments missing, probably identification docs. Sr. would have been sent a copy as would Ann.
That's MY point. Hawaii is part of the US, is it not?
I agree that inquiring about the provenance of this document is a good place to start. It’s been published by World Net Daily, which says that it was provided by Orly Taitz. Here’s the information about provenance from WND: “Taitz told WND that the document came from an anonymous source who doesn’t want his name known because ‘he’s afraid for his life.’”
The judge may find that explanation to be just a little bit too convenient. If I were a judge, I’d want a solid basis before issuing a subpoena demanding that a foreign government produce certain documents. The judge’s problem here is that the only identifiable person associated with this document is Taitz, who, as far as the WND story indicates, cannot personally vouch for its authenticity. The judge has no way of knowing whether Taitz’s anonymous source is just some high school kid who’s good at editing images.