And why would you assume that letter was authentic?
because their is a phone number and address that one could easily use to verify it-call them tommorrow or not.
The University of Hawaii at Manoa is only able to provide the following information for Stanley Ann Dunham:
Dates of attendance:
Fall 1960 (First day of instruction 9/26/1960)
Spring 1963 – Summer 1966
Fall 1972 – Fall 1974
Summer 1976
Spring 1978
Fall 1984 – Summer 1992
First of all, the first line of the letter has been altered from the original, which had nothing about ‘(First day of instruction 9/26/1960)’ written on it, that was added by someone else later.
Fall 1960 then becomes an enrollment date. Calling it ‘Dates of Attendance’ is misleading. Why? Because NO ONE EVER SAW HER IN HAWAII.
And just what Spring 1963 - Summer 1966 proves, is debatable. AGAIN, NO ONE SAW HER! The only first hard evidence we have that she was in Hawaii is when she applied for divorce in January 1964.
I do not plan to telephone anyone in Hawaii. What will I get for a reply? What-ever is written in a record book that follows the dates on the letter?
Don’t tell me that after all this time, you are still following the narrative of ‘Dreams From My Father’?