[notpoliticallycorewrecked]

I admitted it from the beginning, so what is your problem?

I asked for information, which others quickly, quietly and respectively provided without any harassment.

[PA Engineer]

I admitted it from the beginning, so what is your problem?

I asked for information, which others quickly, quietly and respectively provided without any harassment.

Because it was covered multiple times in the 3800 posts previously (as well as high school history). Why not read them first? This was not harassment. It was a simple admission of truth on your part. I'm still reading "every" post and have another 200 to go. If the majority of Freepers would do just that, they would have come to an entirely different opinion on the veracity of the document. My conclusion after reading "every" post and doing my own research is that there are no deal breakers at this point. The timeline stands. The document has yet to be proven a "fraud" in the way "KOS" would like. It may well have been a fraud during the divorce process to determine paternity.