To: Eye of Unk
I mentioned earlier the fold lines which make it look as if it was once stuffed into an envelope. That little tear along the fold line is typical of aging documents. Now if some forensic team could obtain the authentic copy and date the paper to circa 1964, this thing will have traction.
I also previously wrote, there can not be a reason for forging a document in 1964 for a three year old kid.
4,435 posted on
08/02/2009 9:43:22 PM PDT by
BIGLOOK
(Government needs a Keelhauling now and then.)
To: BIGLOOK; BP2; mojitojoe; LucyT
I wonder, did you notice the holes upper left where perhaps a staple had been connecting this page to something else? Did departments like vital records make a carbon copy to retain in file when sending a response to a requested affidavit?
4,473 posted on
08/02/2009 9:58:36 PM PDT by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
To: BIGLOOK
I also previously wrote, there can not be a reason for forging a document in 1964 for a three year old kid.
_______________
I agree, that’s what is really puzzling me. Either someone is exceedingly clever and is very familiar with the obama time line or this may be authentic. If one were going to fake the birth certificate, I would think they not put a date or request for 3 years later................. UNLESS, they could only get that form and not ones prior to that.
4,485 posted on
08/02/2009 10:03:17 PM PDT by
mojitojoe
(All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for the people to remain silent.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson