[Bigh4u2]

“If he wasn’t eligible, Ol’ Hillary would have exposed it in a New York second.”

Possibly.

But it also could be that this document didn’t come to light until just now.

Don’t forget that this is just a ‘copy’ of the original.

And by copy, I mean they used a typewriter to ‘copy’ the information from the original to the newer form.

They more than likely didn’t have ‘copiers’ in 1964.

As a matter of fact, I kinda remember ‘mimeographs’ back then.

Did I just age myself? (ducks for cover)

:)

[ofwaihhbtn]

To everyone,

After doing my best to follow this thread since early this morning here is what it alls boils down to:

Disregarding speculation about fonts and other items for a moment, either the "Book" number and "Page" number of the "Birth Register of this Province" on the birth certificate correspond to the book and page number of the "Birth Register" of the province or they don't.

If they do correspond, one of three things will happen:

1. The birth certificate will be validated and the "Birthers" will be vindicated.
2. The birth certificate is valid and the validation will not be revealed to the public.
3. The corresponding "Birth Register" page will be destroyed.

If they don't correspond, this will be because of one of two possibilities:

1. The birth certificate was a hoax intended to be revealed as a hoax to convince the world the "birthers" are indeed kooks wearing tin foil hats.
2. The birth certificate cross references really do check out and the Kenyan government will lie about that in order to convince the world the "birthers" are indeed kooks wearing tin foil hats.

Any thoughts on this summary of the situation?