I think this is a “win” either way.
If it’s authentic, the truth is out.
If it’s not authentic, this puts tremendous pressure on O’Bozo and his handlers to provide substantive proof to counter it.
JMHO, YMMV.
I agree. We just need to be cautious about declarations as to it’s authenticity. It very well could be but that needs to be proven.
Who cares if it’s real or not - let them defend it.
Alinsky rule - fire with fire....