December 29, 2019
How Obama Impacted the Military
By Janet Levy
Radical changes imposed on our military by progressives, begun in earnest during the Obama administration, are negatively impacting our combat readiness and jeopardizing the lives of our men and women in uniform and, ultimately, our national security.
In Stand Down: How Social Justice Warriors Are Sabotaging Americas Military, author James Hasson elucidates how Barack Obama fundamentally changed military culture to make our nation less secure. Hasson, a former Army captain, Army Ranger School graduate, and Afghanistan veteran, argues that military readiness was sacrificed for identity politics and progressive rhetoric. He lists examples such as policies that established safe spaces, prohibited micro-aggressions, denigrated hyper-masculine traits, implemented unwise green standards and injected social justice guidelines in military operations.
In his revealing book, Captain Hasson describes how Obamas military appointees, mainly progressive ideologues lacking military experience and hailing from academic, political, and the private sectors, were placed in charge of seasoned combat generals with decades of combat experience.
The priorities, experience, and philosophies of the officers and appointees couldnt have been more disparate.
Many senior military staff members suffered in silence at Obamas attempt to use the military as a laboratory for progressive social engineering, according to Hasson.
[snip]
Obama, who, Hasson says, took pride in his lack of military knowledge and experience, made widespread changes to personnel policy, budgetary expenditures and resource allocations that harmed readiness, training and troop safety.
Obamas transgender policy of mixed genitalia in the bathrooms, took precedence over established military culture. Soldiers were judged by the gender they wished to be rather than their biological sex. Obama essentially used the military to lead social change in American society rather than preserving time-honored traditions that emphasized troop cohesiveness and readiness.
The author explains that the cornerstone of every military policy is its impact on combat. The military is most concerned with physical outcomes, the determinant of ultimate success.
That focus was weakened by the transgender policy instituted by the Obama administration allowing soldiers to serve under the sex that conformed to their gender identity even without sex reassignment surgery or other physical changes.
This practice had a profound effect on fitness, performance, and deployability. Hasson recognizes that transgender soldiers have served in the military in the past but according to the physical fitness, grooming, and housing regulations that conformed to their biological sex.
“... The military must find those most qualified to serve and reject those suffering from mental conditions such as anxiety and depression. Transgender people suffer from markedly higher rates of anxiety, depression, and suicide than the general population.
Obamas new policies also negatively impacted the education of cadets, Hasson asserts. Military academy courses on American history were overhauled to focus on race and the pervasive narrative that America is a racist country. The international history class focused on gender and a semester of military history was completely deleted from the curriculum.
How can military students become successful warriors if they eschew military history, are educated to disdain their country, and view history through the lens of race and gender?
Todays military academies have a higher percentage of civilian, liberal professors who have promoted a permissive atmosphere that has contributed to a deterioration in the level of discipline, Hasson adds.
The current environment with its Safe Spaces and emphasis on race, gender, sexual orientation and social justice, as well as rights, are antithetical to the militarys hierarchical structure and its emphasis on duty, merit, discipline, and competence.
As part of the Obama administrations social engineering agenda that attempted to erase the differences between men and women, the Army was coerced to lower its standards for Ranger school to admit women who didnt qualify for the special-forces unit.
Military brass was pressured to provide ample pre-training instruction and multiple do-overs exclusively for female candidates. Further, despite extensive studies that found lowered standards for women to meet progressive goals, they were forced to deny the study results.
When Marine infantry units integrated women, the male-female units had higher injury rates, slower casualty-evacuation times, poorer marksmanship skills, poorer preparation of fortified fighting positions and overall lower battle-essential skill sets than all-male units. Although all-male units outperformed coed units in 70% of combat tasks and mixed units were not recommended, Obama still issued a directive to integrate the Marine Corps infantry companies. Hasson characterizes this policy as fulfilling the dreams of progressive ideologues at the expense of a service members life.
Read More:
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/12/12_27_2019_16_54.html
That Post Turtle didn't think of all this by himself, he had help from a whole gaggle of communists who call themselves democrats. This is the result:
WIKI: Alexander Semyon Vindman (né Aleksandr Semyonovich Vindman) and his identical twin brother, Yevgeny, were born to a Jewish family in the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, Soviet Union