Replies

No problem. Surely the Brits have records who who held what offices, even “chief clerical officer” type positions, in the colonies.

But that doesn’t help, really. A good forger would have already found out who was the principal registrar for that place at that time and made sure he used the right names.

I think authenticity would depend more on forensics— examining the paper, ink etc. In the end, it may be impossible to be sure one way or the other—modern documents are mundane, nondescript and exist in monstrously huge numbers.

Unless, of course, the forger slipped up and didn’t do his research right.

But it’s the Obama side in whose interest it is to show that it’s a fake. Authentication really is saying, “well, at least we can see no obvious signs of forgery.” A perfect forgery, by definition, would never get detected. Of course, absolutely perfect forging is extremely difficult, so an authentication that says, “no apparent signs of having been forged” is, for practical purposes, accepted as proof of not being forged.

Where do you think the document Orly has came from?

I wonder if the document came from the Brits? Don’t know how crazy the global power that be are about a Marxist Muslim as the US Prez who is sympathic to every enemy of the West. Also, he’s spending like he wants to crash the dollar and take down the whole globe.

Israeli intellegence? He’s been kicking Israel in the teeth and BiBi is not really such a nice guy to Israel’s enemies.

Could be Russians or Chinese. They would be thrilled to see a constitutional crisis and civil war in the US. They want to be leaders of the world. Putin wants revenge.

It could just be the CIA as Obummer is trying to fit the whole agency under his bus?

It obviously came from the Stanley Ann and was submitted for some legal purpose: passport, divorce, adoption, etc.

Maybe an American-American or someone spying for the any of the above Nations found it in a court file somewhere?