By the time you authenticate every document you have ever seen and every entry in directories, and accepted every statement made by classmates who have been entrapped by their lies, you might as well go back to quoting straight from ‘Dreams’ because that’s what you are doing, whether you realize it or not. How does it go again? The student from kenya met the little high school girl in Hawaii in a Russian language class, they fell in love and she got pregnant, then they married, she lived with her mother and father and he went to Harvard and she divorced him. And now their son in the white hut.
It’s such a simple little story one wonders why we don’t all buy it just like you do. There’s not the slightest need to be worried that you just might not know who his parents were or where he came from, it’s all in ‘Dreams’ and you can all go back to sleep now.
However, you do have one little problem in your posting history - in which you maintain he was the son of Frank Marshall Davis because the high school girl had the hots for an ugly old black older than her own father, and the KGB financed her trip to give birth in Kenya. Compared to your theories, my explanation of some of the perplexeties sound positively mundane and boring.
Do continue.
Per Fred Nerks:
“By the time you authenticate every document you have ever seen and every entry in directories, and accepted every statement made by classmates who have been entrapped by their lies, you might as well go back to quoting straight from ‘Dreams’ because that’s what you are doing, whether you realize it or not.”
Link please to any time I have quoted Dreams other than to denounce co-author Bill Ayers or to point out inconsistencies or misquotes.
I scrupulously avoid using Dreams as an original or secondary source. You, on the other hand, have frequently quoted from Dreams. You are especially fond of the passages about Stanley Ann being an alleged au pair in Chicago and Auma recounting things Mamma Sarah supposedly said about some of Barry’s half-brothers.
You also used Barry’s Dreams account as your original source (via another author who used Dreams as her source) for your claim to “know” that Barry travelled “alone” to HI.
I challenged you on how you knew that and it came back to Barry himself.
Per Fred Nerks:
“However, you do have one little problem in your posting history - in which you maintain he was the son of Frank Marshall Davis because the high school girl had the hots for an ugly old black older than her own father, and the KGB financed her trip to give birth in Kenya.”
I do not “maintain he was the son of Frank Marshall Davis.” I suggested that as one of several possibilities. I favor BHO Sr. as the sperm donor because Baby David Obama looks very much like Baby Barry.
The SADO in Seattle narrative combined with the INS FOIA documents destroys not only the delusional Mal-Val narrative, but POTUS Barry’s Dreams narrative. SADO in Seatle is the ANTI-Dreams narrative, which should be apparent to all FReepers who are paying attention.
By the time you authenticate every document you have ever seen and every entry in directories, and accepted every statement made by classmates who have been entrapped by their lies, you might as well go back to quoting straight from ‘Dreams’ because that’s what you are doing, whether you realize it or not.
How's your reading comprehension going? I didn't say you quoted from 'Dreams' I wrote that you might as well - whether you realize it not, that's what you are doing. You are following the myth. The myth has the kenyan and SAD as his parents, they met in Hawaii and blah blah blah...which is exactly what you are saying by accepting every document as gospel and directory entry be it for Ann S Obama, Anna Obama or what-ever. (Except of course the bit about the exotic images, the KGB and Frank Marshall Davis, which I won't let you live down, ever.) You've had it explained to you that the U of WA transcript is a very suspicious document, over and over, but still you persist. Your brain is a fossil. No new information must be allowed to penetrate. It threatens your ego. Poor baby. How many freeperts now is that have asked you to be a little more flexible, or maybe even a little helpful? But no, on and on you go, your life's work is now to protect your own scenario...which, come to think of it, you've never really made clear, have you? How could you. You spend all your time tearing everyone else's information apart. It's become your total obsession, has it not? If you were to spend half of the time you spend being a critic, on productive research, how much further along might we all be? You're not stupid, but you are the most obstinate, egotistical freeper I have run across since I joined in 2003.