“Barack obama #2 not listed as a dependent- ‘only Maya’”
Correct, as would be totally appropriate if the Dunhams were claiming Barry as their dependent on their joint return because Barry was living with them and they were providing more than 10% of his room and board, thus qualifying as a dependent is defined in the IRS regulations.
This has NOTHING to due with Ann losing CUSTODY or the Dunhams or someone else gaining custody (as some have erroneously claimed (absent a court order of which there is no evidence). It is simply a matter of who is claiming Barry as a dependent in that year, which can only be done on one return, not two.
What happened in December of 1971 in terms of CUSTODY?
There is a custody question. No one wants to deal with it. But it is very real. No way Obama is in legal custody of SAD or BHO Sr. after December of 1971. They are both foreign citizens living and domiciled in foreign countries.
So who is the legal guardian as of January 1972?
No one wants to answer that sticky question, do they?
Is there a way to retrieve stanley armours and madelyn dunhams tax records of the years, 1943 thru 1960? or anything in between those dates to see the number of dependents listed on there tax returns? Thx
“This has NOTHING to due with Ann losing CUSTODY or the Dunhams or someone else gaining custody (as some have erroneously claimed (absent a court order of which there is no evidence). It is simply a matter of who is claiming Barry as a dependent in that year, which can only be done on one return, not two.”
It’s confirmation of Lolo and Ann losing custody. Furthermore, “date filed” on his COLB and “date accepted” on his original BC is confirmation there was Court adjudication of Obama’s birth record more than a year after his birth.
And there’s the missing page from the Obama divorce. Most likely, it was a copy of Obama’s original long form BC redacted from a finalized divorce record because the Family Court ordered it sealed and archived after the Soetoro adoption. Documents sealed by Court order are legally void. Consequently, there was a Court order to redact the copy of the original long form BC from the divorce record.