[Red Steel]

(1) Plaintiff of record is claiming the title of “Esquire”, which is a Title of Nobility prohibited by the original Thirteenth Amendment ratified circa 1819. Although the organic Constitution for the United States of America (hereinafter “U.S. Constitution”) did prohibit Titles of Nobility, the Framers omitted any penalty(s) for exercising same. The latter Thirteenth Amendment cured that omission by imposing two (2) penalties for exercising any Title(s) of Nobility i.e. a loss of one’s citizenship and a bar from ever holding office anywhere in the United States of America (read 50 States of the Union).

this is irrelevant to the case itself. How many lawyers around the country use "Esquire" in their titles? Nonetheless an irrelevant point.

[Fred Nerks]

He goes by many names, and lays claim to many skills and creations, many of them beyond verification or below the radar of the legal horizon. He considers himself wronged by a snowballing crowd of people inside and outside the courtroom. He feels it is only a matter of time before he will regain what has been taken from him, and that he has only to present his logic and arguments to a forum to be determined later, and all will be right again.
He wants two billion dollars. He wants it now.

He calls himself Paul Andrew Mitchell, Private Attorney General.

http://www.paulandrewmitchell.com/LETTERS/

[STARWISE]

Sounds quite off the wall ...