Replies

NOTICE OF INTENT TO SERVE

SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE

TO: Hon. M. Nyambura Kamau

Consul General

Consulate General of Kenya in Los Angeles

Park Mile Plaza, Mezzanine Floor

4801 Wilshire Boulevard

Los Angeles 90010

CALIFORNIA, USA

FROM: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964

DATE: August 2, 2009 A.D.

SUBJECT: intervention by United States ex rel. in

Berg v. Obama et al., Third Circuit Appeal No. 08-4443

Greetings Honorable Consul General:

My office legally represents the United States (Federal Government) at the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in Philadelphia, in the case of Berg v. Obama et al., Appeal No. 08-4443:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/third.circuit/

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/third.circuit/nad02.htm

Please be advised that newly found evidence renders it appropriate formally to serve your good offices with a SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE, duly issued by the District Court of the United States for the Central District of California.

The purpose of this SUBPOENA will be to command your good offices to produce and permit inspection and copying of an authentic original of the attached CERTIFIED COPY OF REGISTRATION OF BIRTH of Barack Hussein Obama II on August 4, 1961 A.D., at Coast Provincial General Hospital in Mombasa, Republic of Kenya.

Please be aware that there is a separate District Court proceeding presently underway in the United States District Court for the Central District of California which also seeks to compel authentication of said REGISTRATION OF BIRTH: Keyes et al. v. Obama et al., case number 8:09-cv-82 (USDC, Los Angeles, California, USA).

For your convenience, we believe this is a valid link to a true and correct copy of the latest MOTION filed and served in the latter case:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/kenyan-birth-motion-to-expedite-authentication.htm

Thank you very much for your timely and professional consideration.

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a)

http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm

Criminal Investigator and Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13

http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page)

http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy)

http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines)

http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines)

EMERGENCY PETITION FROM THE UNITED STATES EX REL.

TO:

Hon. Judge Rosalyn Higgins (United Kingdom), President

Hon. Judge Awn Shawkat Al-Khasawneh (Jordan), Vice-President

International Court of Justice Peace Palace

Carnegieplein 2

2517 KJ The Hague

Netherlands

Telephone: 31 (0)70 302 23 23

Fax: 31 (0)70 364 99 28

FROM:

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., Private Attorney General

appearing for the United States ex rel. in Berg v. Obama et al.,

U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, USA

DATE:

October 26, 2008 A.D.

SUBJECT:

Berg v. Obama et al., Case No. 2:08-CV-04083 (RBS)

Greetings Honorable Judges:

Pursuant to authority conferred upon me by the United States statutes at Title 18 of the United States Code (“18 U.S.C.”), sections 1510, 1512-1513 and 1964(a), the United States has recently applied for leave to intervene, and for a Writ in the Nature of a Prohibition, in the above entitled case. See:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/intervention.prohibition.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/notice.of.intent.htm

The United States has also applied to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus to compel the latter District Court to rule on said APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE. See:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/obama/mandamus.htm

As you know, the United States is also a State Party to two (2) Human Rights Treaties: the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. See:

http://www.supremelaw.org/ref/treaty/

The Plaintiff of record has now published informal notices on the Internet of his specific intent to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for emergency relief in this matter.

As matters of law, it is the position of the United States ex rel. that the Plaintiff of record, and the United States, both enjoy legal standing to litigate said case. See 28 U.S.C. 1345 and 1346:

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/1345.html

http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/28/1346.html

For several years now, my office has been conducting an extensive investigation of required credentials that are now missing from numerous courts in the United States (Federal) Judicial system.

Of utmost importance, at this time, is the verified documentary evidence indicating that five (5) of the nine (9) “Justices” currently seated on the Supreme Court of the United States are presently lacking one or more of the several credentials required of them, by Law.

This evidence is readily accessible here on the Internet, for your convenience:

http://www.supremelaw.org/copyrite/uoregon.edu/memo.ag01.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/index.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/rsrc/commissions/evidence.folders.2004-03-16.htm

I now beg your sincere forgiveness for getting right to the point now:

Will you kindly authorize my office to commence an emergency civil case before your Court solely by means of electronic communications?

Our limited resources, and the time-sensitive nature of this bona fide Constitutional crisis, both justify a prompt and timely opinion from the International Court of Justice, even if only advisory in nature.

Please reply promptly via email to me at: supremelawfirm@gmail.com or alternatively at: supremelawfirm@msn.com

Thank you very much for your prompt and professional consideration.