But as the judge surely knows, popular vote doesn't elect presidents. It's possible that even you know that. Popular vote is also not a great indicator of margin of victory. Ronald Reagon won the election in 1980 with 50.75% of the popular vote, a bare plurality. But he took 91% of the popular vote and his election is seen as a landslide victory and a repudiation of Jimmy Carter. So by listing only the popular vote, Judge Napolitano was either trying to downplay the size of Lincoln's victory or, given the overall poor quality of the rest of his scholarship, it's more likely he never bothered to check the electoral vote margin to begin with.
This is killing you ain't it, NS. A well educated yankee judge validating all the arguments that I and others have been having with you for years.
Not at all. If anything the miserable quality of the work is making Napolitano look stupid.
But it demonstrates where the people are; much like a poll. You know that, but the typical NS MO is to lie, spin and lie some more. A yankee judge is in my corner and it's killing you. (To All: I predict that NS will not sleep tonight unless the staff gives him an extra sedative.)
Ronald Reagon won the election in 1980 with 50.75% of the popular vote, a bare plurality. But he took 91% of the popular vote and his election is seen as a landslide victory and a repudiation of Jimmy Carter.
Huh?
Not at all. If anything the miserable quality of the work is making Napolitano look stupid.
You wanna see stupid? Look in the mirror.
Your sense of self worth is only exceeded by your inability to admit that you're wrong.