Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
The fact is that Lincoln was popular enough to beat his nearest opponent by 10 percentage points

I wouldn't characterize 39% as 'popular', but keep on spinning, liar.

Your math skills are truly dazzling.

So are you spin skills. /sarc

But you're saying that in 1980 Reagan did not have a mandate, right?

You can hardly call just over 50% of the popular vote a resounding mandate.

If that's the case, then Obonga (the product of the loins of a Kansas woman) received a clear signal in November that the American people issued a mandate to socialize/communize the US.

258 posted on 05/08/2009 4:36:58 AM PDT by cowboyway ("The beauty of the Second Amendment is you won't need it until they try to take it away"--Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]


To: cowboyway
I wouldn't characterize 39% as 'popular', but keep on spinning, liar.

He was more that 10 points more popular than his nearest opponent. And it's no spin to say for a fact that even had Lincoln had only 1 opponent and if he'd still gotten only 39% of the vote then he'd still have been president.

You can hardly call just over 50% of the popular vote a resounding mandate.

But you can certainly say that getting 90% of the electoral votes was.

270 posted on 05/08/2009 5:54:43 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson