Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Terpfen

I think it’s a bad idea because it’s a disincentive for consumption...

As opposed to disincentive for production (income tax)???

As you stated, tax that which you wish to discourage i.e cigarettes, alcohol, earning and production???

You are correct, it would disincentive spending, which is detrimental to a country who borrows in order to spend money it doesn’t have. IMO that is probably why we are in such an economic mess right now.


44 posted on 04/20/2009 4:36:51 PM PDT by John.Galt2012 (I'll take Liberty and you can keep the "Change"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: John.Galt2012
You are correct, it would disincentive spending, which is detrimental to a country who borrows in order to spend money it doesn’t have. IMO that is probably why we are in such an economic mess right now.

Clearly more people should save just according to common sense. I have a problem when people attempt to use tax policy to achieve that higher rate of savings, that's all.
52 posted on 04/20/2009 4:49:02 PM PDT by Terpfen (Ain't over yet, folks. Those 2004 Senate gains are up for grabs in 2 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson