Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
And a war to protect slavery was conducted by slave-owning generals on the pro-slavery side. Again, what's your point? Other than to demonstrate that you still cling to the myth that the war was to end slavery. It wasn't. It was to preserve the Union. As Lincoln pointed out on many occasions

We agree! It was a war about states rights! One side felt states have no rights to secede the other side does! A major breakthrough for you.

584 posted on 03/23/2009 11:56:46 AM PDT by central_va (Co. C, 15th Va., Patrick Henry Rifles-The boys of Hanover Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 581 | View Replies ]


To: central_va
We agree! It was a war about states rights!

No, we agree it wasn't a war to end slavery. From the Northern standpoint it was a war to preserve the Union. From the Southern standpoint it was a war to defend slavery.

One side felt states have no rights to secede the other side does!

And why did those states want to secede? Because of what they viewed as the threat to their institution of slavery posed by the Lincoln election.

587 posted on 03/23/2009 12:05:22 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 584 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson