This may help its hard sometimes to differentiate the 3 cases:
1) Berg vs. Obama, Third Circuit Court of Appeals No. 08 4340
Berg filed Brief on 1/20/09. NOTE: THIS CASE IS WHAT WERE TALKING ABOUT ON THIS THREAD.
2)Berg vs. Obama, U.S. District Court for the ______________
Case filed under seal on 11/07/08 cannot be discussed
3) Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 08-cv-0225
Interpleader case by Col. Hollister against Soetoro/Obama and Biden
1) Bergs case is fatally flawed, will never be heard by SCOTUS.
2) This case is also fatally flawed, will never be heard by SCOTUS.
3) Berg is jumping into unknown legal loop holes here. Do NOT think SCOTUS will want to join Mr. Berg in this exercise.
Stop spamming this thread.
Same stuff, different day with you.
Always the same. Spamming, name calling, telling everyone you have inside knowledge, but nothing ever comes to pass.
(Now on cue.....call me an Obot....tell me to turn myself in to the FBI)
And before anyone tells me to “just get along”. This poster has been doing this same stuff for a while.
Everyone just needs to look back on any of these BC threads to see the truth.
I don’t know about everyone else, but I will hit “abuse” when I see the abusive name calling or the constant spam.
And will not respond to FreeManN after this reply.