Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Frantzie

“This may help — it’s hard sometimes to differentiate the 3 cases:

1) Berg vs. Obama, Third Circuit Court of Appeals No. 08 – 4340
Berg filed Brief on 1/20/09. NOTE: THIS CASE IS WHAT WE’RE TALKING ABOUT ON THIS THREAD.

2)Berg vs. Obama, U.S. District Court for the ______________
Case filed under seal on 11/07/08 – cannot be discussed

3) Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 08-cv-0225
Interpleader case by Col. Hollister against Soetoro/Obama and Biden”

1) Berg’s case is fatally flawed, will never be heard by SCOTUS.

2) This case is also fatally flawed, will never be heard by SCOTUS.

3) Berg is jumping into unknown legal loop holes here. Do NOT think SCOTUS will want to join Mr. Berg in this exercise.


351 posted on 02/04/2009 1:41:46 PM PST by FreeManN (Veritas nihil veretur nisi abscondi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies ]


To: All

It does not benefit our cause to criticize SCOTUS because Berg has failed to make a winning argument.

Berg’s incompetence is NOT the fault of SCOTUS.


395 posted on 02/04/2009 2:47:56 PM PST by FreeManN (Veritas nihil veretur nisi abscondi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson