Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: BP2; All

“LL, is my Constructionist postulate to you regarding Art. II, Sect. 3, Clause 3 not covered in the talking points faxed to you this morning? LOL. Sorry, I’m not going to do you homework for you...”

ROFLMAO!


280 posted on 02/04/2009 11:08:42 AM PST by FreeManN (Veritas nihil veretur nisi abscondi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies ]


To: FreeManN

““LL, is my Constructionist postulate to you regarding Art. II, Sect. 3, Clause 3 not covered in the talking points faxed to you this morning? LOL. Sorry, I’m not going to do you homework for you...”

ROFLMAO!”

Can I be a WITNESS? 2 Art. III Section 3 et seq.?


286 posted on 02/04/2009 11:49:34 AM PST by FreeManN (Veritas nihil veretur nisi abscondi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson