Posted on 02/03/2009 1:14:11 AM PST by rxsid
Current status of Berg's case pending in the 3rd dist. court of appeals (same case the SCOTUS denied the two emergency stay requests)
12/09/2008 Open Document ORDER (SCIRICA, Chief Judge and AMBRO, Circuit Judges) denying Appellant's Motion an Immediate Injunction to Stay the Certification of Electors, to Stay the Electoral College from Casting any Votes for Barack H. Obama on December 15, 2008, and to Stay the Counting of any votes in the House of Representatives and the Senate on January 6, 2009 Pending Resolution of Appellant's Appeal. Panel No.: ECO-16. Scirica, Authoring Judge. See Order for complete text. (CH)
12/10/2008 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (CH)
12/10/2008 Open Document BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Philip J. Berg due on or before 01/20/2009. Appendix due on or before 01/20/2009. (CH)
01/16/2009 Open Document ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Steve N. Hajjar on behalf of Appellee(s) Federal Election Commission. (SNH)
01/16/2009 Open Document Motion filed by Appellee Fed Election Comm to summarily affirm. Certificate of Service dated 01/16/2009. SEND TO MERITS PANEL.--[Edited 01/28/2009 by CH] (SNH)
01/20/2009 Open Document ELECTRONIC BRIEF with Volume I of Appendix attached on behalf of Appellant Philip J. Berg, filed. Certificate of Service dated 01/20/2009 by email. (PJB)
01/20/2009 Open Document ELECTRONIC APPENDIX on behalf of Appellant Philip J. Berg, filed. Manner of Service: electronic. Certificate of Service dated 01/20/2009. (PJB)
01/27/2009 Open Document Response filed by Appellant Philip J. Berg to Motion for summary action. Certificate of Service dated 01/26/2009. (PJB)
01/28/2009 Open Document CLERK ORDER referring Motion by Appellee Federal Election Commitee For Summary Affirmance to the merits panel. It is noted that Appellant filed his brief and appendix on January 20, 2009, counsel for Appellee Federal Election Committee, is directed to inform this office in writing within seven (7) days from the date of this order if they intend to file a brief or rely on the Motion for Summary Affirmance in lieu of a formal brief, filed. SEND TO MERITS PANEL. (CH)
02/02/2009 Open Document CLERK ORDER referring the Response of Appellant to Appellee Federal Election Committee's Motion for Summary Affirmance to the merits panel, filed. SEND TO MERITS PANEL. (CH)
Allow me to simplify.
I am a lawyer. If I need money, I advertise like berg.
If I am really desperate for money like berg I take money from anyone who is dumb enough to give me money.
Then I throw a bunch of cases against the wall of Justice desperately hoping some case, any case will stick.
That in a nutshell is Phil Berg.
BTW, how is his case against “W” for “causing 911” going?
She has a plea for donations and a Paypal link on her web page.
In other words 19 spam posts from 300-350 is just fine on FR?
All right folks here’s the deal.
If we who believe Obama is a usurper can’t stop infighting, lets leave aside the obots for a second, how in the world are we gonna win this thing????
United we stand or divided we fall.
Who the he** cares if one case is better than another???? Lets put them ALL up there and see which one sticks!!! Just get the ursurper hauled out of the white house is all I care about, don’t give a fig if its Berg or Orly that gets it done so long as IT GETS DONE, capiche?
I’m losing respect for a bunch of freepers here....obot freepers...and now apparently ‘birther’(to use an obot phrase) freepers as well.
GET A GRIP. Oh yeah, and STOP WITH THE SPAMMING already!!! It makes you look like an OBOT!
Okay off my soapbox..........
I believe that the basic "truther" case assumes that our entire government is so corrupt that it didn't matter who got elected, the towers were coming down, because they had been "wired" for years.
Don’t forget the left has to divide and conquer us any way they can. So don’t fall into any of their traps. They have troll everywhere. Remember their side is mostly unemployed losers. “We” have to work 60 hours and then freep as well.
The question is who defines the spam?
Each side has its own definition. If we use your method, 60% of the posts on this site are in danger of the zot ;o)
I hasten to say that neither I nor Orly are “LUNATIC TRUTHERS.” i.e., we do not believe that W caused 911 like berg the “truther” lawyer berg does.
We simply want to see BO’s BC.
“This may help — it’s hard sometimes to differentiate the 3 cases:
1) Berg vs. Obama, Third Circuit Court of Appeals No. 08 – 4340
Berg filed Brief on 1/20/09. NOTE: THIS CASE IS WHAT WE’RE TALKING ABOUT ON THIS THREAD.
2)Berg vs. Obama, U.S. District Court for the ______________
Case filed under seal on 11/07/08 – cannot be discussed
3) Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 08-cv-0225
Interpleader case by Col. Hollister against Soetoro/Obama and Biden”
1) Berg’s case is fatally flawed, will never be heard by SCOTUS.
2) This case is also fatally flawed, will never be heard by SCOTUS.
3) Berg is jumping into unknown legal loop holes here. Do NOT think SCOTUS will want to join Mr. Berg in this exercise.
Why do you keep posting the same posts over and over again?
I doubt Orly would have anything to do with you. By spamming this thread over and over you are either very childish or you have issues.
I am sure in my private mail or in another thread where you said you tried to contact Berg but he ignored you. I guess we can see why now.
If you thought Berg’s cases were hopeless or you want to rave about truthers - why did you want to contact Berg?
Maybe Berg did not need a junior paralegals help.
Go back to your “friend of Orly” fantasy. Geez. Seek help dude.
Allow me to simplify.
I am a lawyer. If I need money, I advertise like berg.
If I am really desperate for money like berg I take money from anyone who is dumb enough to give me money.
Then I throw a bunch of cases against the wall of Justice desperately hoping some case, any case will stick.
That in a nutshell is Phil Berg.
BTW, how is his case against “W” for “causing 911” going?
Volunteer! Maybe Jim will give you a comission.
Now I am not saying berg is ‘CRAZY.’
But berg suing W for “causing 911?” IS CRAZY!
LOL!
I think our spam boy (FMN) here must be worried that Berg is getting close to his hero Dear Leader. Why would any sane person spam endlessly if they were not worried about Berg?
Go Berg. Go Orly.
Beginning to think the same thing here. No other reason to keep spamming and drive people away from the threads.
Not at all Frantzie, it is UR SANITY that is in question.
Not at all Frantzie, it is UR SANITY that is in question.
So anyone want to answer the questions about Berg the lawyer who sued W for “causing 911?”
Now I am not saying berg is ‘CRAZY.’
But berg suing W for “causing 911?” IS CRAZY!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.