V-shaped UFOs in NM photos

examiner ^ | January 16 2009

[JoeProBono]

CHAMA, NM - Several meandering V-shaped UFOs near a mountain slope here turned up on a woman's digital photos. Three photos shot with a 21 megapixel camera caught multiple crafts approaching in the first frame, one craft in frame two moving close to the ground while the others take positions in the sky, and then frame three shows all of the crafts moving out of the area.

[Quix]

I have been pondering . . . occasionally . . . your case, however . . .

The odds are . . . you know someone in the know . . . or you know someone who knows someone in the know.

Either they have

NOT

1. commented authoritatively within range . . .

or

2. you have not believed them . . .

or

3. they have lied to you or your closer connection . . .

or

4. they told you the truth and you believe them but you are on the payroll as a disinfo agent

or

. . .

. . .

Regardless . . . your pontifications, rants and rock throwing are real put-offs of little continuing interest.

[Quix]

At some point, regardless of the megapixel design of the camera . . . an image blown up sufficiently will show pixelation.

I don’t understand how you could be so confident of such an assertion . . . sounds idiotic to this layman.

[JoJo Gunn]

Stop with the capital letters and the double spacing and the shadow government stuff and answer the man’s question - why in all these years, with the proliferation of cameras available to almost anyone regardless of their social strata, are there yet no sharp images of a flying saucer?

[Quix]

I guess you never read the report about the government high ranking something or other who was so disgusted with Billdo Klintoon’s brick of what—heroine or cocaine and such goings on that he protested strongly and resigned his position at those levels.

[uglybiker]

In that it winds a lot and is beautiful or what?

uhh...YES! ;-)

Nice big sweepers and a summit just over 10,000ft.

The Cumbres & Toltec runs through the same area.

I've just emailed the article to a riding friend who lives in Chama to see what his take on all this is.

[Quix]

That question has probably been answered hereon probably 2 dozen times.

If you think I’m going to answer you yet again . . .

you are more . . . out of it than I ever imagined.

[JoJo Gunn]

sounds idiotic to this layman

It's certainly all uphill from here on. 

[Quix]

Thanks.

Would love to read his response.

I haven’t ridden that railroad yet.

NOt sure I want that close that remotely to those areas! LOL.

[Quix]

IF

you think I’ve hired you as my formatting coach

you REALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLYYYYYYYYYYYY

ought to see someone at a high rate per hour.

[DevNet]

Because I downloaded multiple pictures from that camera and zoomed in on various regions of them.

Every single picture shows much greater detail - the picture show doesn’t look like it was taken from a $5000 camera - it shows artifacts and errors that the sensor in an expensive camera simply would not show.

Don’t get me wrong - I would love for such a picture to be real - but I don’t think this one is.

[Quix]

Sounds convincing.

Did you zoom in to the point of pixelation???

[JoJo Gunn]

That question has probably been answered hereon probably 2 dozen times.

If you think I’m going to answer you yet again . . .

you are more . . . out of it than I ever imagined.

This isn't about me. It's about the man who asked the question, and by extension everyone else on this planet who asks the same question.

You've publicly pronounced them as "ignorant", so give them your bona fides.

[JoJo Gunn]

Devnet, it's futile, unless you can get the actual original, and actual originals never seem to appear when it comes to claims of flying saucers. 

This is the first image taken by the Albuquerque woman - no cropping - sized down for this web page.

[Quix]

Ike’s comments regarding TPTB:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdrGKwkmxAU

REAGAN one of several times:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ag44dRO8LEA

REAGAN again a different time:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KvC_NDlHoI

JOHN PODESTA IN THE KLINTOON ADMIN . . .

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2Sz-MgoFos

which is one reason . . . the fellow on C2C a week or 3 ago was contending that OThuga will herald the springing of the whole thing wholesale on the public and the planet.

[Star Traveler]

You said — “There have been millions of digital cameras sold over the years where all you have to do is point and push a button and perfect picture. Not one clear picture of a UFO. Amazing.”

It’s not as easy as you think, getting pictures of things in the air. I have tried taking pictures of planes and blimps in the sky, with a good Canon digital camera and what you see with your eyes (and it looks like the camera should pick it up okay), it just doesn’t seem as big or as clear in the digital picture as with your own eyes.

I’ve taken pictures of blimps, which are slow moving and a couple of miles away, and they don’t turn out to be that good.

Another problem with snapping these pictures (even ordinary planes and blimps), if you’ve got your camera in the car or in the house — you run to get it and by the time you’re back (even in less than 1/2 a minute) the thing is gone or behind a tree or cloud or whatever.

But, besides all that — there have been pictures posted on the web and other UFO websites that do show pictures that are taken. They look as blurry and as indistinct as the picture I try to take of *simple* and *ordinary* objects in the sky... LOL...

Another problem with the zoom that some people have on their cameras, is that it’s not an optical zoom but rather a digital zoom and it just blurs the picture more. And in addition to that, when you put on a larger zoom on your camera, besides you getting a blurry picture just from the zoom (on the digital part), you get a blurry picture because it’s harder to hold the camera still when shooting it when on zoom. Furthermore, if the f-stop is not right (depending on your settings on the camera, or the focus isn’t fast enough or right, then you’ll get blurry pictures, too.

There’s a lot going on with those cameras to make things blurry in the sky. It’s not like taking pictures of an outdoor BBQ in your backyard... :-)

[Quix]

BUZ ALDRIN:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HY0K240Hquw

GORDON COOPER:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVL3I2Yv9FA

ED MITCHELL:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVMeqblBgiA

SOVIET COSMONAUT:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3Rbap8Zm3Y

[Quix]

It’s conceivable that

Ginkgo Biloba

just MIGHT help that horrific memory problem.

[Star Traveler]

You said — “Well, I for one would love to be Enlightened.”

I posted to the other guy that asked the question. You can see it at #75...

[Quix]

And that leaves out entirely such things as laminar etc. exotic ionized air flows over the craft’s skin distorting images etc.

[uglybiker]

I guess you and I have different interperetations of 'remote'!

The next town north of Chama is Antonito, Co. The whole trip takes about an hour and a half.

If you head East, it's only 75 miles to Taos.