Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Smokin' Joe
Burden of proof should lie with the applicant, not the burden of proof of a negative with the employer.

Burden of proof in any legal proceeding lies with the plaintiff, doesn't it?

104 posted on 01/17/2009 5:32:43 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
Theoretically.

But this is a employee requirement. It just so happens that the requirement is in the Constitution instead of some corporate handbook.

Employers require their prospective employees to prove their qualifications every day.

We are the employers, the citizens of the United States.

So, pray tell, how can he swear to protect and defend the very document he apparently disregards? All he has to do is show the paperwork, and end the whole thing.

McCain did.

106 posted on 01/17/2009 5:42:20 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson