“It’s muddled, it’s blurred, it’s misaligned, it is corrupted, it looks nothing like what we would could and should expect from a State or Federal Official document to which an official seal is stamped for the purposes of Identification.
It has none of the crispness of an official document printed for the sake of legality.”
Huh?!?
Look at the pic in #209 and here:
http://www.factcheck.org/UploadedFiles/birth_certificate_5.jpg
Those criticisms are no longer valid when applied to these pictures of the COLB that was released. Palmer’s point was that you have to look at the latest COLB released images.
When compared to other COLB’s It’s muddled, it’s blurred, it’s misaligned, it is corrupted, it looks nothing like what we would could and should expect from a State or Federal Official document to which an official seal is stamped for the purposes of Identification.
For instance the crosshatching is blurred and muddled with no clear definition to the lines, and as has been pointed out several times the lines at the corners are misaligned. We know from a number of sources that the border is slightly out of shape that is to say not a prefect rectangle so that the dimensions are corrupted as is the standardized print for like Father Mother and other such entry items when compared to other COLB’s.
But more importantly and despite all the defects in this COLB Obama himself has admitted he has his original in his book “Dreams of My Father”
I discovered this article, folded away among my birth certificate and old vaccination forms, when I was in high school.
Obama has his original but had to prove his citizenship with a series of forgeries the first being the one from the Daily KOs which was so loaded with flaws a blind man could have exposed it.
First it had no seal and no folds and there was the print with the white behind it and the curious backwards and upside down date stamp.
next we saw a more refined version appear on Obama's website. this one was a little more refined if view with a process in adobe bphotoshop I was unable to duplicate you could we were told barely see an imprint of a stamp and a distortion that may have been a fold. Of course this convoluted process was (dis)covered by techdude who has since go into hiding for what ever his reasons are.
Then Obama took a trip to Hawaii to visit his grandmother. and when he got back low and behold Factcheck.org is invited to Obama's headquarters in Chicago (identified by the rug pattern) and takes pictures of the suspect document and announces to the world they have seen it and photographed it(with of course a legal caveat that no one among the fact check crew that actually touched the holiest of holies could Identify a forgery if their lives depended on it)
Of course this quickly allows those that seek to bury any controversy to do so without addressing the most glaring example of what was wrong with the original KOS document, that being the border that was so obvious people with no experience with photo shop could see something wasn't right.
and it is still not right.
You know what? I looked at them, and low and behold, every criticism of the original fake documents were corrected, maybe they learned something reading here on FR?
Of course a traceable Serial number would have been nice.
