Or you could be a paid operative...
As far as your desire to “demand some quality analysis”, go ahead and match what Polarik has done. There’s nothing to stop you.
If it is at your best that we put aside Polarik, then your burden of proof is pretty high because his contributions have been very valuable. So far, your contributions on this issue have been, as you admit, attention-seeking.
If a couple of people clicked on the link for photo #5 and saw the evidence of a real artifact, then I have made some progress. If Polarik makes a concerted effort to address that photo, then I will have succeeded. Unfortunately for you, I don't think he will.