Posted on 11/15/2008 6:48:02 PM PST by palmer
Sorry, you’re wrong.
“1-1. PERSONS TO BE REGISTERED AND DAYS OF REGISTRATION
1-101. Male citizens of the United States and other males residing in the United States,
unless exempted by the Military Selective Service Act, as amended, who were born on or
after January 1, 1960, and who have attained their eighteenth birthday, shall present
themselves for registration in the manner and at the time and places as hereinafter
provided.
1-102. Persons born in calendar year 1960 shall present themselves for registration on any
of the six days beginning Monday, July 21, 1980.
1-103. Persons born in calendar year 1961 shall present themselves for registration on any
of the six days beginning Monday, July 28, 1980.
1-104. Persons born in calendar year 1962 shall present themselves for registration on any
of the six days beginning Monday, January 5, 1981.”
For a while in Hawaii, a birth announcement from a newspaper was all that was needed to get a COLB issued.
Welcome to FR. Glad you could sign up today to defend palmer and 0bama...
They’re a bunch of community organizers sent to agitate us.
hmmmm, crickets.
Good post. Maybe even worthy of its own thread. We could include links to some of the more pertinent and interesting articles to help freepers come up to speed as this issue gathers momentum.
Oh, null and void.
We are too great friends. Where the heck did I say that?
My best regards.
When compared to other COLB’s It’s muddled, it’s blurred, it’s misaligned, it is corrupted, it looks nothing like what we would could and should expect from a State or Federal Official document to which an official seal is stamped for the purposes of Identification.
For instance the crosshatching is blurred and muddled with no clear definition to the lines, and as has been pointed out several times the lines at the corners are misaligned. We know from a number of sources that the border is slightly out of shape that is to say not a prefect rectangle so that the dimensions are corrupted as is the standardized print for like Father Mother and other such entry items when compared to other COLB’s.
But more importantly and despite all the defects in this COLB Obama himself has admitted he has his original in his book “Dreams of My Father”
I discovered this article, folded away among my birth certificate and old vaccination forms, when I was in high school.
Obama has his original but had to prove his citizenship with a series of forgeries the first being the one from the Daily KOs which was so loaded with flaws a blind man could have exposed it.
First it had no seal and no folds and there was the print with the white behind it and the curious backwards and upside down date stamp.
next we saw a more refined version appear on Obama's website. this one was a little more refined if view with a process in adobe bphotoshop I was unable to duplicate you could we were told barely see an imprint of a stamp and a distortion that may have been a fold. Of course this convoluted process was (dis)covered by techdude who has since go into hiding for what ever his reasons are.
Then Obama took a trip to Hawaii to visit his grandmother. and when he got back low and behold Factcheck.org is invited to Obama's headquarters in Chicago (identified by the rug pattern) and takes pictures of the suspect document and announces to the world they have seen it and photographed it(with of course a legal caveat that no one among the fact check crew that actually touched the holiest of holies could Identify a forgery if their lives depended on it)
Of course this quickly allows those that seek to bury any controversy to do so without addressing the most glaring example of what was wrong with the original KOS document, that being the border that was so obvious people with no experience with photo shop could see something wasn't right.
and it is still not right.
There's enough smoke around this to make me think there's a flame....
But, I dunno for sure about much these days........
MOLON LABE
BTW, the Constitution does not limit the prohibition of ex post facto laws explicitly to criminal statutes, though there have been breaches of that prohibition in other areas of the law. In those instances, for the most part, no one was harmed and so no suits questioning the constitutionality of those statutes were filed.
LOL!
I'll clear it up in a bit...
We are too great friends. Where the heck did I say that?
My best regards.
You didn't. I was quoting plamer. He said it.
While I was looking for my original Kenya honeymoon post, I came across your link to the Eunice Moscoso/Austin Statesman article about his Kenyan relatives who claimed they attended 0bama's birth in Kenya. Since I quoted you in my post, I pinged you to it...
No harm, no foul. (More coffee? I can have Darks whip you up some)...
Crumbs my dear friend:
“While I was looking for my original Kenya honeymoon post, I came across your link to the Eunice Moscoso/Austin Statesman article about his Kenyan relatives who claimed they attended 0bama’s birth in Kenya.”
I must be losing my mind. Please refresh my mind where I said that.
My best regards to you and love to your family.
FALSE. While the Selective Service registration requirement had been dropped for a few years, the Carter Administration reinstituted required Selective Service registration (though not an active draft) in 1979. Men born in 1961 (about 18 years old at the time) were among those required to register in accordance with the Carter Administration directive.
I think that is an excellent idea. That way people won’t be trying to discuss the situation lacking the facts/history. And agitators can be directed there to study up and get back later.
Ignore the bad analyses, and accept that all the speculation only lays out possibilities. The real story is all the suits, and Obama’s attempts to stonewall. There could very well be something here
I agree we need to get to the bottom of it, but it won't happen if you ignore the bad analysis. For one thing there are numerous people here who aren't convinced who are not paid agents or closet Obama supporters. I think you'll get a lot further accepting and acknowledging the criticism.
After your nap go back to post #359 and find this line:
Here Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer) quotes Eunice Moscoso of The Austin Statesman:
...and click on the red underlined Here.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.