I really didn’t have any objection to the tag, just the designation of “religion”.
***Then I can continue to use the tag.
Discussions about designation of religion can continue on this thread as well. It sounds like much of your objection would be something to discuss with the religion moderator. It’s not very likely that you’ll change the way that I think on the subject, so that end of it is a timewaste.
There are several different categories of freepers who are involved in crevo threads. There are the atheists who already have a tag. There’s the nascientischism/whateveritismists who now have a tag. There are christisans, catholics, mormons, buddhists, etc. who obviously have a tag. So it’s not like your viewpoint isn’t represented by a tag, your objection appears to be that a tag is being generated on the nascientists’ behalf because they’re not inclined to generate it themselves. Well, that’s something between you and the religion moderator. There are plenty of freepers who think this nascientism thing is an emerging religion. If that isn’t enough for you, then your beef is with the religion moderator. Any catholic who accepts the theory of evolution can log onto a scientism tagged thread, so the objection to this system pretty much covers a very minute slice of freepers and I only have so much patience for such a small audience.
It's not going to be represented by a tag on these "ecumenic" threads you start. In fact it's purely hypothetical whether anyone's is.
No, that's between us. You're a little too big to be hiding behind nanny's skirt.