[Kevmo]

So who gets to decide which ones are doing that?
***The mod for whichever section the thread is posted to. The crevo threads degrade into cacophany, while the ecumenical threads are more of a success in terms of civility. The religion mod has built himself a toolset that the other mods haven’t, and it’s available to those of us who consider scientism/naturalism/whateveritisismwithPizazz to be a religion can access those tools.

[tacticalogic]

***The mod for whichever section the thread is posted to. The crevo threads degrade into cacophany, while the ecumenical threads are more of a success in terms of civility. The religion mod has built himself a toolset that the other mods haven’t, and it’s available to those of us who consider scientism/naturalism/whateveritisismwithPizazz to be a religion can access those tools.

The assertion is:

No, just those who try to stifle debate and expression of facts that don’t conform to their agenda and demand dogmatic allegiance to their side. That’s something most evoluts do and what few creationists would never attempt to.

Do the religion moderators have a dictionary with a definition of "dogmatic" that produces the result of only one side ever being "dogmatic"?

[tacticalogic]

The religion mod has built himself a toolset that the other mods haven’t, and it’s available to those of us who consider scientism/naturalism/whateveritisismwithPizazz to be a religion can access those tools.

I'm still not on board with telling other people what their religion is for them, particularly if it's an exercise in trying to turn a perjorative into a religion as a form of personal attack.