Aside from “Greeks are Known Gluttons” as the title of a thread, I’m sure we could work out a way to prevent titles from being intentionally inflammatory.
On the other hand, it is important that people be allowed to be themselves behind closed doors. So if a baptist thread is dealing with an issue about baptism, then they should be allowed to disagree with all us baby baptizers, use all their sources, and even say they think all of us are going to hell, if that’s what a goodly block of them feel. They do so in their churches, so why not here?
I only gave examples of headlines; you can imagine the content that corresponds with the headline.
It will instantly transform FR into a internet-cook hate site.
One can discuss positive beliefs now on the caucus thread. I can post about veneration of saints, baby baptisms and priestly garments as day is long. That is a good thing. You suggested to allow “bashing” of other religions without the other side being able to respond. That will damage FR.
They do so in their churches, so why not here?
***They do so behind closed doors, not in the open. That would be a freepmail conversation you’re talking about.