Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Kevmo
Science is not a religion, but putting your faith in science is a religion.

Is there any theistic component or requirement for the term "faith"? In some respects, you put your faith in science everytime you get on an elevator or an airplane.

156 posted on 07/01/2008 10:59:17 AM PDT by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic

Is there any theistic component or requirement for the term “faith”? In some respects, you put your faith in science everytime you get on an elevator or an airplane.
***As far as I can tell, no, there’s no theistic component. See post #38 for my perspective. Did you read the thread before you started posting?


158 posted on 07/01/2008 11:06:26 AM PDT by Kevmo (A person's a person, no matter how small. ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]

To: tacticalogic

Some folks can’t see a distinction between faith and confidence.

I have confidence that a bridge will hold me because I have seen others drive over it. After I have driven over it a number of times, my confidence is increased.

I have confidence in the opinions and statements of certain people due to experience. My level of trust depends on my overall experience with individuals.

The word “faith,” in the context of discussions of science, does not refer to confidence and trust based on experience. It specifically refers to belief in supernatural causation. Same for “religion.”


159 posted on 07/01/2008 11:11:24 AM PDT by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson