Posted on 02/24/2008 12:22:04 AM PST by NoWayMcCain
Larry Sinclair's drug test came back earlier than expected. He was tested for any and all chemical substances including illegal drugs that could cause an inaccurate polygraph test result. There were no traces of any such substances found.
We are awaiting for the second polygraph expert to verify the original results and should have an answer by Monday. Video of the polygraph exam will be posted shortly.
Who the hell is Larry Sinclair!
The guy that Hildabeast is using to smear B. Hussein Obama.
Funny how the unsubstantiated accusations are things that Hildabeast has a long history of doing herself. Just ask her girlfriend.
Bless your heart for real.
And, welcome to Free Republic.
The search function, needy as it may be, is your friend.
I hope he turns out to be the real deal, but if he’s not, then I hope that truth comes to light, too.
“The search function, needy as it may be, is your friend.”
I used it and didn’t see this posted.
No problem...I said the search function was “needy”. ;o)
Ya’ done good.
Good post, and Welcome to Free Republic.
BTW, I don’t always welcome folks. ;o)
DC2K, have you ever seen so many vanities? So many two line vanities? So many newbie vanities?
Let’s change the name to FreeVanity.com.
Regards
This was posted yesterday, but so what?
BUMP!
While it’s possible to fake a test, it’s not as simple as most would like to believe. The main ways are drugs (apparently ruled out), an abnormally high baseline (which can be spotted by a decent examiner) and by being a psychopath (how a guy like Ted Bundy was able to pass).
There is a reason that polygraph tests are commonly used by law enforcement even though they are generally not admissible in court.
You don’t have to be a zen master. Every test has control questions — something like “have you ever taken office supplies home?” that provoke a guilty response. Learn to spot the control questions, put a tack in your shoe, and you can generate a stress response to the control questions. That way, you can mask the lies.
This is not a vanity. It’s a legitimate news story posted by the site (whitehouse.com) that’s paying lots of money for Larry’s polygraph. Click the link.
whitehouse.com was originally a porn site.
Thank you.
Now the Left will never believe him.
Are lie-detector machines available to the public, for people to practise their lying skills?
This was actually posted by pissant on another Larry Sinclair thread yesterday and I said at the time that the news deserved its own thread. Voila! Good job.
Believe it or not, this one is sincere.
AND..it’s not a vanity.
He/she has a link to another source.
WHY would you call this a vanity?
Just WHO are you?
Do you have an agenda?
Or are you trying to score points somewhere?
Judge not lest you be judged...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.