Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Bitsy

And that differs from the current system, how, exactly? Congress can raise the income tax rates anytime it cares to and we are virtually powerless to resist. Not so with consumption based taxes.

From Federalist No. 21:

“...It is a signal advantage of taxes on articles of consumption, that they contain in their own nature a security against excess. They prescribe their own limit; which cannot be exceeded without defeating the end proposed, that is, an extension of the revenue. When applied to this object, the saying is as just as it is witty, that, ``in political arithmetic, two and two do not always make four.’’

If duties are too high, they lessen the consumption; the collection is eluded; and the product to the treasury is not so great as when they are confined within proper and moderate bounds. This forms a complete barrier against any material oppression of the citizens by taxes of this class, and is itself a natural limitation of the power of imposing them.

Impositions of this kind usually fall under the denomination of indirect taxes, and must for a long time constitute the chief part of the revenue raised in this country....”


32 posted on 02/17/2008 10:02:35 AM PST by DivaDelMar (CRAm member-- (Conservative Republicans Against mcCain) Think you're entitled to my vote? CRAm It!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: DivaDelMar
Remember.. the folks she’s quoting didn’t even have indoor plumbing, for take it FWIW.
40 posted on 02/17/2008 10:22:52 AM PST by xcamel (Two-hand-voting now in play - One on lever, other holding nose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson