[Abundy]

Please explain the difference and how I'm "mis-stating what the nature of the rulings are".

I did and you either don't or won't understand the difference.

Your "statement" of the law doesn't take into account that there are three different methods of analysis which depend on the type of individual right that a law seeks to regulate.

Your "statement" is either an intentional misrepresentation or a misrepresentation born of ignorance. Or both.

Regardless, it is still a misrepresentation of the law.

[Mojave]

Your "statement" of the law doesn't take into account that there are three different methods of analysis which depend on the type of individual right that a law seeks to regulate.

Red herring and non sequitur. Go, baby!

[robertpaulsen]

"Your "statement" of the law doesn't take into account that there are three different methods of analysis which depend on the type of individual right that a law seeks to regulate"

Yes there are three. But since we were discussing a fundamental right, why bring up the other two -- just to show off? I don't need to do that.

You, on the other hand ...