Hell, I've given him specific quotes and cites before in other threads and he just ignores them, now he wants me to re-post them to him to get him off the thread?
Emerson lays out the all of the scholarly research, precedent and arguments at the time of the case that requires an individual right interpretation, but also why the second amendment will have to be incorporated by the States. (i.e. Emerson concluded it was a fundamental right.)
where Emerson went wrong, was applying the wrong method of evaluating the statute in question. They didn't use a strict scrutiny standard, instead using a rational basis standard. If they had used the strict scrutiny standard the issue would have made it to SCOTUS long before Parker.
Ohhhhhh, you were referring to posts I made on other threads ... years ago ...that you don't feel like looking up? But you're sure I made them. Uh-huh. And you know they're wrong. Uh-huh.
Look, just use any of my posts on THIS thread. Why would I suddenly stop lying?
Or you can just apologize now and get it over with.