To reiterate: You advocate a position whereby the Federal government could punish women, children, elderly, infirm, cripppled, and anyone else not expected to serve in combat - just for keeping and bearing arms for the security of a free state (which, at minimum, includes themselves).
I'm not looking at California. I'm far more inclined to look at the Federal government, which already has denied modern standard individual combat arms (M16/M4) from not only non-militia members, but also from militia members.
I know. It's an a-nal-o-gy.
"which already has denied modern standard individual combat arms (M16/M4) from not only non-militia members, but also from militia members."
From members of a well regulated state Militia? Which one?