So you think that even though Mitt might get the nomination he “would lose the general election”.
And that without knowing who the Dem nominee he’d be running against would be? If the Amnesty/”Comprehensive Immigration Reform Bill” is going to be used as a toss-up ball, with both parties basically telling us they want to get it passed and so should we, the Republicans AND Democrats are going to have to do yet MORE gauging in more subtle ways as to who their nominees should be, because they have yet to show much awareness of just how much dissatisfaction with the bill there is to large parts of BOTH their parties. Things are way too touch and go now to be calculating anything, perhaps.But Romney is the one who comes across as the one who actually even RECOGNIZES the importance of the issue-—except for Hunter, the rest of them seem to dance around it, with McCain out-Demming the Dems on it. He has REALLY been shameful, I have never heard such dishonest demagoguery of an issue from anyone who still won’t call himself a Liberal.
Romney’s just being what he is: A crass political opportunist. Not that many months ago, he was singing the praises of all of the worst aspects of the current shamnesty bill. Bleh.
-—except for Hunter, the rest of them seem to dance around it,
***Bump that. Duncan Hunter is the best candidate in the race and I hope he gains some traction from this issue. All of this satisfaction from both sides of the aisle shows that he has strong crossover appeal.