[Peach]

What does that have to do with my post to you? Talk about a change in subject.

But if you want to discuss minority status, did it bother you in the least that such a majority of freepers supported Alan Keyes in 2000 when it was clear he wasn’t out of double digit status?

Haven’t you noticed how most of the nastiest posters who pretend to be perfect conservatives don’t ever support candidates who have actually announced or could actually win? There’s something a little off there.

[wagglebee]

The point is that Rudy's support on FR is VERY LOW and the vast majority of FReepers understand that Rudy is VERY LIBERAL. So, it should not come as a huge surprise to Rudyites here that he is being criticized.

Haven’t you noticed how most of the nastiest posters who pretend to be perfect conservatives don’t ever support candidates who have actually announced or could actually win?

The fact that Fred Thompson hasn't announced doesn't mean he's not running.

As far as Hunter goes, I admit it is a long shot; however, his poll numbers are about where Clinton's were in 91 and Carter's were in 75.

[SJackson]

Over there posters don't have to put up with being called Rutards, old hags, Desperate Housewives, be accused of "needing a good lay", be exposed to constant spam, etc. FR used to have rules but they are clearly being ignored and not enforced, and that can only be happening because the word came down to let the forum fight it out. And some people don't like that kind of fighting.

Is puppy killers OK? I really like the puppy killer charge.

Haven’t you noticed how most of the nastiest posters who pretend to be perfect conservatives don’t ever support candidates who have actually announced or could actually win? There’s something a little off there.

Actually I've noticed the fiercest don't support anyone, whether they could win or not.