[Verax]

There's not "visible bulge" mentioned in the FEMA report

Says there was only very minor damage.

[Darkwolf377]

Many conspiracy fantasists will go on about the FEMA report (which was premilinary and which led to the more detailed NIST report which will be published later this year) saying that the collapse initiation due to diesel fires had "a low probability of occurring". They take this to mean that it wasn't obvious that the building was going to collapse. It means nothing of the sort. The signs of the collapse developed over a long period - they were the bulge, the flames and smoke, and the creaking and leaning of the building. What FEMA is talking about is the events which led to these signs. It was obvious to the FDNY fire crews at the scene as the day progressed that the building was going to collapse. That is why they cleared an area around the building several hours before the collapse. Anybody who claims that the only people who knew the building was going to collapse must have been told by the people who were going to demolish the building has to include the firefighters in the subsequent cover-up.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2007/03/part_of_the_conspiracy_2.html#commentsanchor

Later.

[duck duck goose]

Im not wasting my time on Rosie. I hope we can find a really big muzzle for her.