"And isn't that what the R party is suppose to stand for?"
I'm sure you could check the party platform for that, however, I think the "Less Gov" in Libertarian and Liberal is more on social issues anything goes. But for Liberal it means more Gov on everything else.
I have always joked that Libertarians were just armed Liberals that didn't like paying taxes. ( there may be some truth in that).
I like that!
I think it's scary what they define as 'conservative' on that site.
"Liberals and libertarians agree in choosing the less-government answers, while conservatives and populists agree in choosing the more-restrictions answers".
If that's what 'conservative' means, then there's a big problem. I believe the *vast* majority of this country, on personal issues, does not want the govt to restrict us. "Personal Freedom" and all that.
If that's what that site means by 'conservative', then i wouldn't agree. That's not how I define it.
I'd argue that 'Liberals' want a 'liberal' use of govt. And conservatives want a 'conservative' use of govt. Like spending 'liberally' v. spending 'conservatively'.
Ls want 'more govt'. Cs want 'less govt'.
So the 'Socials' are very liberal, by that definition. They want govt intrusion into personal areas.