Exactly my sentiment. When a candidate campaigns, their plea is "Vote for me!"; when I go to the polls, I vote FOR those I determine fitted to the position.
If the GOP wants my vote, they'll offer someone to vote FOR them, not some lame-a$$ excuse to vote against their opposition especially when the two kool-aids are the same flavor. I believe, with a Democrat House and Senate, the GOP needs someone with more definition as a Conservative Republican than JulieAnnie, or else Republicans can expect to be railroaded.
With JulieAnnie's record, there ain't a whole lot of differentiation from the Democrat challengers to sway towards him. If that's the best the GOP can offer it deserves to lose.
"...the GOP needs someone with more definition as a Conservative Republican than JulieAnnie, or else Republicans can expect to be railroaded"
"If that's the best the GOP can offer it deserves to lose."
There sure are a lot of non-Republicans here giving advice to the GOP.
Republicans will vote for their nominee.