Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: freedomdefender

I think it's pretty clear that Reagan wanted the votes of religious conservatives, but I've seen scant evidence he was a religious conservative, or that he led as one.


89 posted on 01/30/2007 5:32:25 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (Republican, Bostonian, Bush supporter, atheist, pro-lifer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]


To: Darkwolf377
I've seen scant evidence he was a religious conservative, or that he led as one.

Fine, then what you're admitting that being opposed to abortion doesn't make you a "religious conservative." Because Reagan was strongly pro-life, he even wrote an anti-abortion book while he was president ("Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation"). That didn't make him a "religious conservative." I don't want a "religious conservative" as our nominee, but I DO want a Reaganite, and that means someone who's conservative on social as well as economic and defense issues.

95 posted on 01/30/2007 5:35:21 PM PST by freedomdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

To: Darkwolf377

It wasn't until the GOP added social conservativism to its platform that it becamse a majority party. Before Reagan came along and added pro-life to the party's small-government platform, the GOP was the minority party. Reagan added the social traditionalists - that was a big share of the "Reagan Democrats". The pre-Reagan GOP "leaders" like Ford didn't like broadening the GOP tent to include these folks -- but that's why Ford lost and Reagan won. Now we've got Rudy-fans who want to go back to the Gerald Ford days, the days when the GOP snubbed the social conservatives - and lost.


103 posted on 01/30/2007 5:38:30 PM PST by freedomdefender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson