Rudy is for and has already done the following....cutting taxes, cutting the size of government, massively reducing welfare rolls, doing away with set asides for minorities and women owned business, staunchly for the prosecution of the WOT, to name but a few difference. He is also FOR SCOTUS justices that are strict CONTRUCTIONISTS, such as Scalia, Roberts, and Alito.
So, if you claim that there is no difference, you are either lying or ill informed or both. Which is it?
wow calling me a liar?? thats sweet. musta hit a nerve;)
to answer your Q-
niether, ive looked at their records and i dont see much difference.
im not saying id vote for hillary, infact i dont even buy into all this hype that only rudy can beat her.
conservatives will come in MASS to beat hitlary (just as they did Gore) if we have a solid CONSERVATIVE candidate.
oh and lets not forget that her own base (the moonbats) hate her.
moderates? maybe, but there arent near as many as ppl claim.
infact ive found very few moderates and the ones that are, usually dont vote, they are moderates because they dont stand for anything.
We need a real conservative to run, not "hillary light".
If hillary changed her stance on the WOT what would really be the diff between her and rudy???
Im for duncan hunter and i believe time will show him to be the frontrunner. i guess well see in the coming months:)