[garv]

I have to confess I did not read the version of the article you linked to. That piece was originally posted as its own thread on January 18th and sourced from Human Events You can verify that here.

That version of the piece did not contain the information on reporting discrepancies in the national data. Perhaps Murdock revised the piece for NRO after his attention was called to it.

In any case, I was not trying to distort factual information, I was merely too lazy to read something I already read. Obviously, the new data paints a more favorable picture for Giuliani, although I must confess I still find it meaningless.

Giuliani's own statements are clear on the issue and until he modifies, revises or repudiates them there is no softening his position.

[Stag_Man]

Very well then, I withdraw my criticism. Other than that, I think we can only agree to disagree.