[editor-surveyor]

The judge played the same game that you are playing here.

[si tacuissem]

The judge played the same game that you are playing here.

Which game is this? Nailing jelly to a tree?

[atlaw]

The judge played the same game that you are playing here.

If you choose to, you can, of course, provide some marginal support for your thoroughly bizarre, conspiratorial claim (that a United States District Judge lied in the body of his published opinion when he summarized the substance of the testimonial evidence).

All you need to do is demonstrate that, preceding the date of the McLean v. Arkansas decision (January 5, 1982), there were in fact scientific articles espousing creationism which were refused publication in a scientific journal.

Have at it.