To: si tacuissem
What you did in #455 is specifically against the rules here.
To: editor-surveyor; si tacuissem
What you did in #455 is specifically against the rules here. It was well done though. :-)
hehehe
To: editor-surveyor
What you did in #455 is specifically against the rules here. Beep. Circle takes the square. Bringing up some idiot's prior posts is only illegal on the Religion forum.
Rule of thumb: If you don't want your idiocy preserved for posterity, the best bet is not to post it online.
465 posted on
01/17/2007 8:34:39 AM PST by
Junior
(Losing faith in humanity one person at a time.)
To: editor-surveyor
What you did in #455 is specifically against the rules here. The RULES:
- Don't jump threads - If you get involved in an argument in one thread, it's considered poor manners to restart the previous argument in the middle of an unrelated thread.
Not guilty, your honor!
I didn't restart the argument - that would be futile, as you will never answer the simple question I made...
I just thought I could spare someone the similar frustration by sharing my experience with your kind of scientific debate.
474 posted on
01/17/2007 8:48:59 AM PST by
si tacuissem
(.. lurker mansissem)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson