what part of their actual science isn't reputable? Peer reviewed findings by them aren't reputable enough for you? I'm sure you're not going to insinuate that simply being Christians they are exempted from 'real science' right? AIG's funding automatically nullifies their hard earned respect in the scientific world? Automatically makes their FACTS and evidences null and void? Please-
If you want to get right down to it- how about addressing the fact that scientists in the secular world have foisted complete lies onto the whole world time and time and time again, and dogmatically denied doing so? Wouldn't that as well disqualify them from any futre serious concideration in your calculation of things? Does that disqualify every single secular scientist? Does the fact that represent a BELIEF system every bit as faith based as religion disqualify them as you imply that it does ID'ers?
ID'ers use the VERY SAME methods of discovery and annalysis that secular scientists do- If you have problems with the scientific facts they present- do feel free to discuss them- but villifying their science due to the fact that they are 'deemed guilty of practicing science while Christian" is simply an attempt to avoid the hard scientific facts that they represent.
Can Christian scientists make mistakes? Sure- Can secular Scientists? Yes- and they have- for centuries.
This systematicly disqualifying their science due to their outside belief in God is disingenuous.
What "peer reviewed findings" are you referring to? Be specific.