and this disproves that he presented scientific facts how now?
"and this disproves that he presented scientific facts how now?"
Not by itself, but I have shown other 'distortions' (lies) and you have not addressed those. This is just an example that your 'scientific sources' are paid to generate pre-determined' facts.
How can one trust a 'scientist' that takes this pledge and is paid for his 'research'.
"The Bible is the written, word of God, and because we believe it to be inspired thruout [sic] all of its assertions are historically and scientifically true in all of the original autographs. To the student of nature, this means that the account of origins in Genesis is a factual presentation of historical truth."