Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: antiRepublicrat
Here's a short list of a portion of antiRepublican's lies and misdirections on this thread, alone. Lies that I show all ultimately go back to his months long defense of illegal hacking done by Russians and others. Meanwhile he's admitted the lies he admits he knowingly made on behalf of the hackers were quote "fun", and has used ridiculous excuses for them, including accusing me of sex with a goat. I wonder if he still thinks he's having fun with his lies LOL, Lord knows I sure am.

*is just too funny coming from you.

- antiRepublican begining his attack on my claim that posters should quote Stick with the facts, they always win in the end., as he doesn't believe in honesty or accuracy and has already outright admitted he knowingly and purposefully lied for months in defense of illegal activities of Russian hackers.

*Since when?

- antiRepublican denying he hadn't just tried to claim the same advantages for Linux that Apple users enjoy even though he had just said you don't need as many people to manage Linux, or probably Mac on the post immediately above.

*Are you still bitter over being exposed as a fraud?

- antiRepublican attempting to claim I'm the actual fraud in his reply to my factual post that he had lied, admittedly now on purpose, for months, defending Russian hackers

*you saying that Stallman wants all patent laws overturned, you saying he's against "IP" when according to his own statements he isn't, and in fact relies on "IP" to protect his own works.

- antiRepublican with his typical defenses of radical moonbat green party leftist Richard Stallman, "the father of free software" who claims his "ultimate goal is to make proprietary software obsolete.

*They did not distribute OS X, just found a way to put it on a non-Mac PC

- antiRepublican continuing his defense of the illegal copyright infringement conducted by the Russian hackers, again claiming as he had months ago that it couldn't be criminal since only the hack and not OSX itself was distributed, even though other Russians have been criminally charged for only distributing a hack and not the content itself years ago. Here he is again with the same lie from months ago, claiming you actually have to be distributing the copyrighted works themselves in excess of $1,000 value in a 180-day period to be eligible for criminal prosecution under the NET Act. The article didn't say they were distributing OS X itself.

*I didn't defend him, I don't even like him.

Another absurd lie, he was obviously just defending him in a post just above, not to mention it has been going on since he first showed up on this site, including some of his first comments ever made on this site such as where he created a ridiculous vanity title to a thread called Democrats ahead of Republicans on Open Source and proceeded to pimp Stallman and Linux at the DNC and even claiming Maybe Richard Stallman was right that in the future all software will be free. Another one of his first posts on this site was You are right in that I don't like Bush very much., fact is some of us have had this guy pegged from the beginning.

*you might want to stop using the term "cracker," to refer to black-hats, as it was coined by Stallman himself.

- another perfect example of the near worship status antiRepublican feels for Stallman and hackers/crackers.

*I had lied when I said he opposed them.

*he berated us for mocking and denigrating the Westboro Baptist Church. He actually defended that cult -- can you believe it?

This is another one of his absurd lies, he accused me of being in some cult I had never even heard of, nothing surprising just more of his lies trying to smear me and Christians all at the same time. Here is his quote: Maybe he's one of those Phelps Westboro Baptist Church whackos

*You claimed my continuation of the test was in defense of Russian hackers. ..Second lie...You said that I was trying to make excuses for Russian hackers. Wow, partially true

Obviously while he cannot even make up his own mind LOL he has been making endless excuses for the Russian hackers, even though he has denied was ever defending them here, here, here, here, here, here, here, etc etc, obviously you were the one lying, as expected already being an admitted liar.

*He showed no indication of knowing about either the tool or its author despite his claims of working in a position that pretty much requires that he know about at least the tool.

This is one of the pathetic excuses has made to defend the lies he has admitted to knowingly and purposefully making that attempted to claim Our military is using open source software written by a Russian hacker to secure its networks. He never even mentioned what supposed tool he was referring to when he began his lies, and his hacker buddy N3WBI3 admitted even he wouldn't have know the origins of the tool either.

*To play on GE's paranoia of Russians...Because GE is paranoid of Russians, and I was playing to his paranoia.

Another one of his slimeball excuses for lying for months in defense of the Russian hackers, as opposed to my rightful concern of hackers from Russia or anywhere who are pirating Apple's software.

*The story did not even accuse them of unauthorized distribution of OS X. The story stated they did find a way to make OS X run on a regular PC. Thus, you fail to substantiate your claim that they are "pirating Apple's software."

More of his excuses for the Russian hackers, claiming they weren't contributing to pirating it and again aluding to his lie that it couldn't be criminal if OSX itself wasn't distributed with the hack.

*No, that was fun.

antiRepublican claiming it was quote "fun" to quote "lying on purpose for months." When questioned immedaitely if lying on purpose for months was quote "fun" he responsed quote Yes, it was. So he admits not only that he lies, that it is "fun".

*You're barking up the wrong legal tree here, as there is no evidence they distributed even one copy of OS X.

antiRepublican still defending Russian hackers, and still attempting to claim they couldn't possibly be criminal since OSX wasn't distributed, a common lie of his proven wrong later in the thread.

*When are you going to get it through your skull that I'm not defending hackers, but debating points of law?

More obvious lies, since he has been defending them all along, going back over months when he first started lying that our DoD extensively used software written by Russian hackers, which he later admitted to being a lie he purposefully and knowingly commited.

*I, Golden Eagle, had sex with a goat,

Pefect proof of the level of scumbag we are dealing with, who makes such ridiculous vulgar claims from his obvious desperation in defending his lies.

*And, for reference, the hack in question is essentially the equivalent of the common Windows slipstreaming tools. The software the hackers wrote will let you create an OS X install DVD that will install on a Dell.

Another obvious lie, slipstreaming Windows is perfectly legal, typically to include security patches, while cracking OSX so that it will run on non Apple equipment is obviously illegal if not criminal. These are the lines he continually tries to blur as he continues to lie in support of illegal hacking.

* But none of that applies criminally, since they are never claimed to have distributed OS X.

More lies that the hackers had to distribute OSX before they could be referred to as criminals, when I had already shown that it can in fact be criminal if the hackers don't distribute anything but the crack itself.

*Copyright has always been traditionally a civil law. Criminal prosecution for certain actions in certain cases is a relatively recent addition.

Another lie, even he admitted later that criminal penalties were inacted in 1909 or ~100 years ago..

*The law requires that willfulness be proven by the accuser. Infringement is non-willful until proven otherwise.

More ridiculous excuses for the Russian hackers, claiming they couldn't have possibly known it was illegal to run OSX on Dell, which of course would be a lie by the mere fact they had to hack the product in the first place.

*a later hacker involved in this, and the one currently running the show for "OSX86" is an Apple fanatic who already owns Macs, and isn't even Russian

More defense of illegal hacking, as typical.

*NEVER believe the BS in a C&D. They are designed to intimidate, and the lawyers can put whatever BS they want in them.

More defense of illegal hacking, claiming that Apple's cease and desist letter was quote "BS".

*Microsoft did "lift" BSD code.

Another lie, while antiRepublican has been endlessly defending Russian criminals who cracked IP from a US company, he is quick to accuse US companies of "lifting" code from a freeware project. His defense is that he doesn't agree with the connotation of theft that the word "lifted" carries. How typical, considering his contsant leftist anti-copyright defense of hacker theives.

*Being shown for the fool and fraud you are is really burning you up, isn't it?

Again falsely accusing me of being the fraud, this ridiculous post of his was made in direct response to my documented and proven claim he had for months been falsely claiming Russian hackers wrote software for our DoD which was a lie you admit you knew was a lie when you posted it.

*"Lifting" DOES equate to "stealing"

Here he is trying to backtrack from where he claimed quote I don't agree with the connotation of theft that the word "lifted" carries and for which he had already been busted with references to definitions at dictionary.com.

*How is it a defense to say they're subject to massive civil penalties, just not criminal?

More lies claiming he's not been defending hackers who cracked Apple's OSX operating system, when in fact it obviously goes back for months when he first started making lies he has since admitted to. He might as well be their lawyer, endlessly trying to get the criminal charges dropped, so he can then find some loophole in the civil case. At one point months ago, he even was bringing up the 180-day period to be eligible for criminal prosecution rule ROFLMAO.

*Yet again, a lie.

Actually of course, this is antiRepublican lying again, trying to claim he has done a 180 in his convictions and is suddenly a proponent of copyright, intellectual property like software patents, protection mechanisms like DRM, when we all know that's a ridiculous lie. LOL at the obviousness of the absurdity.

516 posted on 01/14/2007 4:07:31 PM PST by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies ]


To: Golden Eagle

Here's another example of antiRepublican basically accusing unsuspecting Christians of supporting Westboro on a recent thread again, one of his favorite smear attempts. This guy is a real slimeball, comes to a conservative site and then starts spouting all kinds of leftist BS and falsely accusing folks of being Christian cultists, while pushing his atheism and defending criminals endlessly.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1762944/posts



517 posted on 01/14/2007 5:29:28 PM PST by Golden Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 516 | View Replies ]

To: Golden Eagle
Nice try, but when you post a list of "lies" you should make sure they are actually lies, not just stuff you don't agree with. You should also not create your own lies in the process through mischaracterization and out-of-context quotes.

*I, Golden Eagle, had sex with a goat, Pefect proof of the level of scumbag we are dealing with, who makes such ridiculous vulgar claims from his obvious desperation in defending his lies.

I asked, you didn't respond, but now I see you still didn't get the point. Maybe that's why you continue taking everything out of context. Go revisit that post and see if you can finally figure it out.

Here's a hint: I know you know how to hilight text, because you had to do it to copy that text.

518 posted on 01/14/2007 9:13:35 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 516 | View Replies ]

To: Golden Eagle
Your BS was too thick to wade through, but I'll just pick out this one gem:

*Microsoft did "lift" BSD code. Another lie, while antiRepublican has been endlessly defending Russian criminals who cracked IP from a US company, he is quick to accuse US companies of "lifting" code from a freeware project.

You took that out of context, twisting it 180 degrees from its obvious meaning, were called on it by me and another, yet you spew it again. You are sick.

Are you just hoping to catch people who read only that post, but don't look further to find the truth? All anyone has to do is follow those links to find out that you are completely full of it.

520 posted on 01/14/2007 9:22:11 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 516 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson