Yet again, a lie. Isn't there a board dedicated to libel that you can join? You may feel more welcome there.
Of course, you're the one lying, here's another one of your own quotes showing your disdain for "intellectual property", and I already showed above where you are opposed to software patents, not that that's any secret either despite your pathetic attempt to now deny it LMAO:
"Intellectual Property" is a fiction and the term shouldn't be used. - as stated by antiRepublican
Of course, you're the one lying, here's another one of your own quotes showing your disdain for "intellectual property"
I love your twisting and lying. It's so creative. Notice you said I have a disdain for "intellectual property" with the connotation that all of what is referred to as "IP" shouldn't exist. My statement you quoted so out of context:
"Intellectual Property" is a fiction and the term shouldn't be used
Now shall I yet again add the context you conveniently omit?
"Intellectual Property" is a fiction and the term shouldn't be used. It helps perpetuate the confusion we see these days, where people don't know the difference between patent, copyright and trademark. The big difference here is that copyright doesn't require that the work be non-obvious, just original, so of course any original software can be copyrighted."
The actual context is that I don't like the term "intellectual property" because copyright, patent and trademark (what gets lumped under "IP") all operate under vastly different laws. In fact, my post was about a mixup between copyright and patent by someone who used the term "IP."
and I already showed above where you are opposed to software patents
Now you quietly change your story, hoping I won't catch it. Not long ago I was supposedly opposed to all patents. Would you like to retract that lie now?